Russia
Source: tass.com

Russia provides UNRWA with platform to explain Gaza situation to BRICS — agency chief

Philippe Lazzarini explained that against the backdrop of the terrible crisis in Gaza, he wanted to warn the BRICS members of the consequences of banning UNRWA's activities in the conflict zone

MOSCOW, April 28. /TASS/. Moscow has provided UNRWA with a platform to explain the agency's position on the catastrophic humanitarian situation to high representatives of the BRICS countries, Philippe Lazzarini, Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), told TASS in an exclusive interview.

"I am in Moscow today because there is a meeting among the BRICS members on the Middle East at the level of the Deputy Foreign Ministers or Special Envoys. I received this invitation to address the BRICS as a group. I just came from New York where I was also at the Security Council," the agency chief said.

Lazzarini explained that against the backdrop of the terrible crisis in Gaza, he wanted to warn the BRICS members of the consequences of banning UNRWA's activities in the conflict zone. "There would be an impact on our collective ability to respond to the current unprecedented crisis," the UNRWA commissioner-general pointed out.

According to him, in addition to the humanitarian challenges in the Gaza Strip, the agency "is now under strain and numerous calls, including by the Israeli government, to dismantle or cease its activities in the Gaza Strip."

In this context, the UNRWA chief emphasized that "dismantling the main organization, which is also the main backbone of the international response in Gaza, can only weaken our collective effort to reverse this looming famine." "As we know, Gaza has been a little bit of all the superlative, if you look at the number of people killed, the number of children killed, the number of medical facilities and hospitals destroyed, the level of destruction, the level of displacement in the Gaza Strip and today we are even talking about an artificial famine, which is looming," he pointed out.

Transitional period

Lazzarini stressed that even in case of a ceasefire in Gaza, UNRWA must continue to provide basic services to the residents of the enclave until a full Palestinian state is established.

"Let's say we have a ceasefire tomorrow. There wouldn't be a long time between the ceasefire and the 'day after.' Or that's what I call the 'day in between.' It might last one, two, three years. During that time there will be extraordinary protracted humanitarian need. UNRWA is the only organization, which is capable to provide at scale basic services such as access to primary healthcare or access to education in the absence of a functioning state," the agency chief said.

So if a decision is made to get rid of UNRWA during such a transitional period, it will only deepen people's despair, Lazzarini said. "We might sow the seeds of future resentment, revenge and violence, and we might also undermine any political process. One of the main objectives is to also address the countries constituting the BRICS," he concluded.

About UNRWA

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East was established on December 8, 1949. As the situation in Palestine remains unresolved, the agency's mandate continues to be expanded. To date, the agency provides assistance to some 5.9 million people. About one-third live in 58 officially recognized camps in Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. The rest live in or near host towns, often not far from official camps. The agency is headed by a commissioner-general appointed by the UN secretary-general.·In late January, several countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States, announced the suspension of UNRWA funding because of suspected links to the radical Palestinian movement Hamas. Lazzarini ordered the dismissal of several employees who may have been involved in a Hamas militant attack on Israel in the fall. The agency later accused Israel of torturing captured employees to extract "false confessions" of links to the radical movement.· A report released on April 23 by an independent UN evaluation team on UNRWA's activities stated that Israeli authorities have so far failed to provide any evidence to support their accusations.

The full text of the interview will be published on the TASS website at 10:00 a.m. Moscow time (7:00 a.m. GMT).

Russia
Source: russiancouncil.ru

Sviatoslav Arov: What can explain the popularity of BRICS among so many countries of the world? Is BRICS an epitome of a multipolar world (in terms of relations between its members and their geographical location) in Russia's view?

Sergey Ryabkov: The interest towards BRICS has been steadily growing against the backdrop of large-scale geopolitical challenges and dramatic changes taking place in the world today. The influence of BRICS countries, their successes in the economic, cultural, scientific and technical spheres speak volumes about the potential to shape the global agenda.

BRICS is an innovative format of interaction rather than just a union of individual states. BRICS partnership is built on mutual respect for each other's interests and a common effort to promote the realization of developing countries' aspirations on the whole. At the same time, BRICS does not oppose itself to anyone and is ready to build equal and mutually beneficial cooperation with all international actors. Such an approach, practiced by BRICS, attracts the majority of world states. This was clearly demonstrated by the summit held in Johannesburg on August 22-24, 2023, which was attended by the leaders of more than 60 countries of the Global South and, most notably, African countries.

Today, BRICS is seen as one of the pillars of a new, more equitable world order, which is designed to give all countries equal opportunities, to free the states of the Global South and Global East from the role of obedient suppliers of cheap labor and raw materials that the West imposes on them, and to consolidate the right of all nations for preserving their identity, self-determination, independent domestic and foreign policy, and protection of traditional values.

Russia and other BRICS countries fully share this stance and are in favor of an honest partnership that denies any exceptionalism. This is the reason why in the recent years more than two dozen states, including dynamically developing world centers and major regional players from all parts of the world, have declared their desire to join BRICS. In response, during the Johannesburg summit, the leaders agreed to welcome Argentina[1], Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE into the group from January 1, 2024. Furthermore, the leaders also instructed the foreign ministers to further develop the country partner model, which should contribute to the further development of a stable BRICS circle of friends.

Sviatoslav Arov: What made the recent expansion of the BRICS possible? Which factors did really lead to this process? Was it difficult to negotiate the issues on enlargement?

Sergey Ryabkov: In my response to the previous question, I have already outlined the international background in which the conditions for the expansion of the BRICS were formed. But I would like to add that the invitation of new members was made possible thanks to the common BRICS founding countries' understanding of the importance of strengthening strategic partnership in the association, as well as its role and position in the international arena, including as an advocate of the interests of the Global South. Of course, the expansion would not have been possible without the responding interest of the countries that applied to join BRICS. It is important that all of them support the fundamental values of BRICS, including the spirit of solidarity, equality, mutual respect, transparency, inclusiveness, mutually beneficial cooperation and consensus, and are ready to jointly uphold the interests of the World Majority in the new expanded format.

As for the negotiation process itself, it was undoubtedly a delicate diplomatic work. As far as I can remember, no interstate association or organization has ever managed to carry out the necessary work on all the modalities of expansion and reach definite agreements in such a short period of time.

Sviatoslav Arov: How have sanctions affected the activities of BRICS in terms of relations with Russia? Recently the Development Bank failed to finance projects in Russia due to obstacles created by the West. What efforts are BRICS making to continue cooperation and to circumvent these pitfalls?

Sergey Ryabkov: I think it is now obvious to everyone that the illegitimate sanctions have had the opposite effect to what their authors intended. These sanctions catalyzed an active search by most members of the international community for mechanisms of interaction that would be resistant to Western sabotage.

The BRICS experience in this sense is very illustrative. Russia's trade and economic interaction with BRICS partners has only grown since the large-scale and unprecedented restrictions were imposed on our country. We are reaching record trade levels with Brazil, India and China.

There has been a steady development of the whole range of cooperation in three key areas: politics and security, economy and finance, and humanitarian contacts. The recent examples of practical achievements in BRICS include the launch of the BRICS Vaccine Research and Development Centre in virtual format, the beginning of practical implementation of Agreement on the Cooperation of the BRICS Remote Sensing Satellite Constellation, the approval of the BRICS Initiative on Denial of Safe Haven to Corruption, and the adoption of the BRICS Digital Economy Partnership Framework.

This year, under South Africa's Chairship, BRICS cooperation has been enriched with new dimensions. A decision on the establishment of the BRICS Youth Council was taken. A Joint Working Group on Sports was launched, and cultural and academic exchanges deepened. An agreement was reached to expand the BRICS Network University to include additional number of universities from BRICS countries. All this is clear evidence that BRICS cooperation is not vulnerable to external influences.

Sviatoslav Arov: How do the BRICS member states cooperate despite contradictions and will the BRICS expansion lead to increase in such contradictions? Some states still have territorial disputes, for example, but it is not a stumbling block for them to cooperate. Why the same approach cannot be implemented in relations between Russia and the collective West?

Sergey Ryabkov: BRICS is an innovative format of interstate cooperation, bringing together different cultures and civilizations, countries with different economic and political systems, and often different views on some issues on the global agenda. Our common goal is a firm commitment to pursuing an independent domestic and foreign policy, defending sovereignty and our national interests. Over the years of cooperation in BRICS, a special culture of dialoguehas emerged, open and trustful relations have been established, based on the principles of sovereign equality, respect for the choice of individual development paths and consideration of each other's interests. This helps our countries to always find a common ground and solutions even on difficult issues. This is exactly the format that should become the basis for a fairer multipolar world order, a model of equitable interstate communication aimed at constructive search for answers to the challenges the world faces, without pushing any values and external interests. The secret of the BRICS success is that it does not have any confrontational or hidden agenda. It is a union of like-minded nations which cooperate on the basis of consultations and consensus, rather than on the master-slave principle, where someone sets the tone and the rest follow these guidelines. I am convinced that the countries that joined BRICS on January 1, 2024[2], share the spirit and culture of the BRICS interaction, and Russia, as the next chair, is ready to provide them with the most active assistance for successful integration into the BRICS family.

The deterioration of relations with the collective West was not initiated by us. The responsibility for this lies entirely with the United States and its allies. Russia has been repeatedly emphasizing that it is not closing itself off from anyone and is ready for the closest possible cooperation, of course, exclusively on an equal and mutually respectful basis, with all states concerned in confronting the common challenges that humanity faces.

Sviatoslav Arov: What are Russia's priorities for its forthcoming chairship in BRICS? What are the most promising areas for cooperation between member states? And what are the most stumbling ones?

Sergey Ryabkov: As part of Russia's BRICS Chairship in 2024, we intend to continue developing strategic partnership on the basis of consensus and continuity, and work to enhance its role in world affairs. It is also reflected by the motto of the Russian BRICS Year: "Strengthening Multilateralism for Equitable Global Development and Security". We are planning to hold about 200 events of various levels, which will be hosted by over a dozen Russian cities.

During the Russia's Chairship we intend to pay close attention to building up foreign policy coordination in the BRICS format, primarily within the key international platforms, as well as to further strengthening cooperation with the states of the Global South. We will continue to cooperate on combating terrorism, money laundering, corruption and the criminal assets recovery. We will make additional efforts to jointly seek common responses to information security threats and challenges, and to improve the legal framework for cooperation in this area.

There is much work to be done to comprehensively implement the BRICS Economic Partnership Strategy 2025 and the Action Plan for Innovative Cooperation for 2021-2024. An important aspect of our work will be to enhance the role of the BRICS countries in the international monetary and financial system, develop interbank cooperation, facilitate the transformation of the international settlement system and expand the use of national currencies of the BRICS countries in their trade with each other. We will promote strengthening of the dialogue between fiscal, customs and antimonopoly authorities.

"Nevertheless, we know the course of history cannot be reversed. We are witnessing the Global Majority – the states of Eurasia, the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean – gain a stronger foothold in the world system. Most of these countries are increasingly asserting their national interests and identities and striving for genuine strategic independence – not in isolation, but in cooperation with other free and independent states that respect international law. In other words, their national interests are now at the forefront, as opposed to the whims of former metropolises… BRICS represents a cooperation network for regional and subregional processes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This cooperation network is expected to promote harmony and deepen integration within the Global Majority around the world. Our presidents and prime ministers discussed these topics during their meetings. Once again, these efforts are not designed in any way to create a new mechanism enabling the Global Majority to impose its will on others. On the contrary, in everything we do or say, in all our declarations and our actions, all of our countries emphasise that we are open to starting an honest and equal dialogue at any time… We will focus on ensuring the smooth inclusion of our new colleagues and new BRICS members in everyday activities. We will continue prioritising cooperation with countries (nearly 30 of them) that have shown an interest in a rapprochement with BRICS and are prepared to participate in our practical projects".

The 2023 Johannesburg Declaration documented a focus on increasing settlements in national currencies and strengthening correspondent banking networks to support international transactions. This topic will also become one of the priorities during our chairship. Of course, this issue is not an easy one; it will be necessary to carefully work out the ways of practical realization of the course taken. This will be handled by the relevant agencies. The need to find alternative means of cross-border settlements is obvious. Most countries have already realized that the dollar monopoly, which is weaponized by Western countries to pressure other states, undermines the stability of the global financial and economic architecture, provokes new crises and distances prospects for achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).

Our work will undoubtedly focus on enhancing cooperation in science, innovation and health care. We will pay special attention to promoting contacts between academic and scientific centers, research and higher education institutions of our states and strengthening the potential of the BRICS Network University.

We also intend to promote further deepening of the dialogue in culture, sports and youth exchanges. In particular, we plan to organize the BRICS Games in June 2024. We will be happy to welcome athletes from the BRICS countries to the International Multisport Tournament Games of the Future which will be held in Kazan.

The BRICS summit, scheduled for October 2024, will be the culmination of the Russian year in BRICS. We intend to continue the tradition of organizing on the sidelines meetings with developing countries. We believe that cooperation within the BRICS framework and its mechanisms of interaction with like-minded nations will enable the voice of the Global South to sound louder and clearer in the international arena, as well as to defend our national interests and the right to choose our own path of development.





[1] In December 2023, after taking presidential office, President of Argentina Javier Milei sent official notifications to Brazilian President Lula da Silva, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, that his country would not join the group. – Editor's Note.

[2] Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates formally joined the BRICS group on January 1, 2024. – Editor's Note.

Russia
Source: valdaiclub.com

The original international collaboration between the large and growing economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China has evolved and expanded.

Its initial inclusion of South Africa contributed significantly to affording a voice for the vast continent of Africa (our common homeland, and the origin of our species-being). Its current members now also include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates; BRICS+ now represents nearly 3.64 billion people who constitute approximately 45.78 percent of the world's population.

South Africa' Minister of International Relations and Cooperation recently revealed that at least 34 other countries have indicated their interest in joining the voluntary political association that is BRICS+. It is therefore already a voice for a significant portion of the global majority, i.e. most of the people occupying our planet, and could soon be even larger; hopefully it will be a byte louder too.

BRICS+ operates within a very turbulent period in world history as the economic weight of the collective West continues to decline. The group currently accounts for approximately "36 per cent of global GDP, and 25 per cent of world trade, measured in terms of exports" (Holtzmann, 2024). The resilience of the BRICS and its evolution into BRICS+ also presents further evidence against the ill-informed narrative of the end of history and the false triumphalism of globalised neoliberal capitalism.

Drawing upon these empirical facts, I would like to contribute some ideas regarding the emergence of the new world order and the role of BRICS+. I have organised these along three vectors: plausibility, possibility, and probability.

The plausibility of the BRICS+ advancing the new world order has increased as the existing hegemony, and the unilateralism of the group of seven highly industrialised and mature capitalist economies in our contemporary conjuncture, comes under widening criticism and deepening polycrises. The so-called 'rule-based' system that apparently followed the end of the Second World War has been exposed in its hypocrisies and biases.

It will prove extremely difficult to return to the previous world order, as its legitimacy and support dwindles in the face of the realities experienced by the global majority. Even within the G7 countries, their domestic majorities are confronting the inequities of combined and uneven development that have witnessed an expansion in poverty and underdevelopment while a privileged minority thrives.

The probability of the BRICS+ fulfilling the expectations and demands of the global majority is, however, neither automatic nor predetermined. Rather, the cooperation and collaborations between the BRICS+ nation have generated goodwill and increased people-to-people opportunities through programmes and initiatives such as the successful World Youth Festival recently hosted by Russia. These offer seed-crystal potential that could over the next few decades radically alter world systems.

By working together, the BRICS+ nations have shown that multipolarity can work, notwithstanding differences amongst them. This has been achieved while those adhering and aligning with unipolar efforts at enforcing homogeneity flounder amid the realities of an international political economy in flux. The global CoVID-19 pandemic and vaccine apartheid showed the world that the current hegemonic forces in world affairs are only interested in their own interests, and that the profitability of their transnational corporations trumped saving people's lives.

We are at this time also witnessing genocide in praxis as the present government of the United States of America fails to adhere to both General Assembly and Security Council resolutions on conflicts in west Asia and in Palestine in particular. With death tolls expanding and precarity rising, we cannot continue to claim to be United as Nations. Many of the BRICS+ countries are playing a leading role in seeking a sustainable resolution to the catastrophe, or at least halting the devastation.

Some amongst the BRICS+ members have made significant contributions towards reforming, and even transforming some of the institutions of global governance. The current array of institutional apparatuses such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organisation, and the various agencies of the United Nations have already gained geriatric status as they age beyond the 65-year-old threshold. Notwithstanding continental and regional variations, the median age of the world population is estimated at less than half that age, or approximately 30.7 years old. The median age in Africa is 18.8 years. Addressing this chasm and enabling inter-generational work across the BRICS + countries significantly enhances the possibilities for consolidating multipolarity and enabling pathways towards better futures for all.

To conclude, while it is important to remain critical and forge perspectives which reject that which fails to serve our collective interests, it is also absolutely imperative to consolidate our views about what we actually want from the new world order.

Rather than only being against the collective West, BRICS+ stands to gain significantly from articulating a vision of the new multipolar world order. Realising a better world for all is within the grasp of the BRICS+ and will be constructed through the efforts and initiatives of the people and institutions that constitute the association.

Transcending narrow economics, and intersecting with the wider domains of society, culture, and governance will become increasingly more necessary as the current hegemonic arrangements falter and fail. Our success at the level of our species-being has allowed us to expand beyond 8 billion people. This has most essentially been driven by the deployment of the capacities and capabilities which we have constructed through learning and the intergenerational transmission of knowledge.

BRICS+ must confront all efforts which seek to capture, enclose, and expropriate the global knowledge commons for the exclusive benefit of the few. Learning from and with each other, should prove to be our best strategy for resilience, in both thoughts and deeds: contributing to resolving the various polycrises prevalent in contemporary world systems.